Rare earth elements (REEs) form the invisible backbone of modern military technology, enabling everything from precision-guided missiles to stealth fighters. Yet, the U.S. Department of Defense faces a profound strategic risk: an overwhelming dependence on China for these critical materials. As of 2025, China controls approximately 85 percent of global REE processing and over 90 percent of magnet production, creating a chokepoint that Beijing has repeatedly exploited through export controls. This vulnerability not only threatens operational readiness but also undermines America’s technological edge in an era of intensifying great-power competition. Recent escalations, including Beijing’s April 2025 restrictions on seven heavy REEs and further expansions in October, have already triggered supply disruptions, price surges, and production delays across the defense industrial base. While the Pentagon has invested hundreds of millions in diversification, progress remains glacial, leaving U.S. forces exposed to potential embargoes that could halt assembly lines for key weapons systems.
The Nature and Strategic Importance of Rare Earth Elements
REEs encompass 17 metallic elements, including neodymium, dysprosium, samarium, and terbium, prized for their unparalleled magnetic, luminescent, and conductive properties. Unlike more common metals, these elements are not geologically scarce—deposits exist worldwide—but their extraction and refinement demand complex, environmentally intensive processes that few nations undertake at scale. Refining involves separating REEs from ore using acids and solvents, generating toxic waste laced with radioactivity, which has deterred investment outside China.
For the Pentagon, REEs are indispensable enablers of high-performance systems. Neodymium-iron-boron magnets, for instance, power the electric motors in guidance systems for Tomahawk cruise missiles and Joint Direct Attack Munitions, providing compact, efficient propulsion under extreme conditions. Dysprosium enhances magnet heat resistance, crucial for the F-35 Lightning II’s radar arrays, which must withstand supersonic speeds and electromagnetic interference. Each F-35 incorporates about 920 pounds of REEs, distributed across avionics, actuators, and laser targeting modules. Virginia-class submarines rely on over 9,200 pounds per vessel for sonar transducers and propulsion controls, while Arleigh Burke-class destroyers use around 5,200 pounds in fire-control radars and stealth coatings.
Beyond magnets, REEs underpin night-vision goggles (using yttrium for phosphor screens), satellite communications (gadolinium in amplifiers), and hypersonic weapons (scandium alloys for thermal barriers). A 2025 Govini analytics report estimates that 78 percent of U.S. weapons—spanning 1,900 platforms and 80,000 components—depend on REE-derived materials. This integration stems from decades of design choices prioritizing performance over supply resilience, assuming global markets would remain stable. Today, however, such assumptions falter against China’s market dominance, forged through subsidies, lax regulations, and aggressive acquisition of foreign mines.
China’s Dominance: A Monopoly Built on Economics and Policy
China’s grip on REEs evolved from opportunistic expansion in the 1980s to deliberate statecraft by the 2000s. Initially, low labor costs and minimal environmental oversight allowed Beijing to undercut competitors; U.S. production at the Mountain Pass mine in California, once the world’s largest, ceased in 2002 amid rising expenses. By 2010, China supplied 97 percent of global REEs, a position reinforced by mergers of state-owned enterprises into “Big Six” conglomerates like China Northern Rare Earth Group.
State policies have weaponized this control. Quotas cap domestic output to manage prices, while export licensing—introduced under the 2020 Export Control Law—enables selective restrictions without violating World Trade Organization rules. Beijing justifies curbs as “national security” measures, echoing U.S. tactics on semiconductors. In 2010, China halted shipments to Japan over a territorial dispute, spiking prices 500 percent and alerting the world to REEs’ leverage potential. Similar moves in 2023 targeted gallium and germanium for chips, and 2024 hit graphite for batteries.
The 2025 escalations mark a sharper edge. In April, amid U.S. tariffs reaching 145 percent on Chinese goods, Beijing restricted samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutium, scandium, and yttrium—elements refined almost exclusively in China (99 percent capacity). Exporters now need licenses, with approvals tied to end-user scrutiny. By October, controls expanded to five more (holmium, erbium, thulium, europium, ytterbium) and technologies like extraction patents, applying a “foreign direct product rule” variant: any item with 0.1 percent Chinese REE content requires Beijing’s nod. Military-linked firms face outright denials, while semiconductor applications undergo case-by-case reviews.
These steps affect 88 percent of DoD’s critical mineral chains. Even non-Chinese-mined REEs often route through Chinese refineries; Australian antimony, for example, becomes unusable for U.S. systems post-processing. The result: a “license wall” allowing Beijing to throttle flows dynamically, delaying shipments without formal bans. Chinese state media frames this as reciprocity for U.S. “containment,” with officials hinting at further tightening if tariffs persist.
Impacts on U.S. Defense: Disruptions and Escalating Costs
The fallout for the Pentagon is immediate and multifaceted. Pre-2025 stockpiles—enough for months, not years—have buffered initial shocks, but sustained curbs could idle production. Lockheed Martin’s F-35 program, already strained by a 2022 magnet alloy scandal, faces delays; each jet’s 50 pounds of samarium magnets are now license-dependent. Virginia-class submarine builds, averaging one per year, risk halts without dysprosium for actuators, potentially pushing timelines from 2028 to 2030 deliveries.
Price volatility compounds the pain. Post-April bans, gallium parts rose 6 percent in three months, antimony 4.5 percent—outpacing general DoD inflation at 1.4 percent. Heavy REEs like terbium, vital for missile guidance, have surged 20-30 percent, inflating contracts by 23 percent annually since 2010. A drone manufacturer reported two-month halts in 2025 due to magnet shortages, echoing auto sector woes where Ford idled Chicago lines.
Broader readiness suffers. Hypersonic programs, like the Army’s Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon, rely on scandium for nose cones; delays here erode deterrence against China’s DF-17. UAV fleets, including Predators, need neodymium for motors—disruptions could ground surveillance assets. The CSIS warns that U.S. munitions output, already fivefold slower than China’s, widens further, as Beijing accelerates its buildup unhindered.
Geopolitically, this erodes alliances. Partners like Japan and the EU, facing similar squeezes, question U.S. leadership if supply chains falter. In the Indo-Pacific, where REE-dependent assets like F-35s are frontline, vulnerabilities amplify risks in Taiwan scenarios. Economically, the DoD’s $850 billion budget strains under hikes; a full embargo could add billions, diverting funds from innovation to mitigation.
U.S. Responses: Investments, Alliances, and Persistent Gaps
The Pentagon’s countermeasures blend urgency with incrementalism. Since 2020, over $540 million in Defense Production Act funds have seeded domestic chains. MP Materials, operator of Mountain Pass—the sole U.S. REE mine—received $400 million in July 2025 equity, yielding the DoD a 15 percent stake and funding a “10X Facility” for 10,000 tons of magnets annually by 2028. Lynas Rare Earths, Australia’s top producer, got $35 million for heavy REE separation in Texas, aiming for 1,000 tons of NdFeB magnets by late 2025.
Allied “friendshoring” diversifies risks. The 2024 National Defense Industrial Strategy targets a full mine-to-magnet chain by 2027, partnering with Australia’s Nolans project (4 percent global NdPr by 2032) and Canada’s Vital Metals. Recycling initiatives, like E-VAC Magnetics’ $94 million grant, target e-waste recovery, potentially yielding 35 percent of demand. The 2025 Critical Minerals Security Act offers 30 percent tax credits for processing, while Executive Order 14241 streamlines permitting.
Innovation probes substitutes: cobalt-free magnets or AI-optimized REE use could cut needs 20 percent. Stockpiles have grown since 2010’s Japan crisis, covering six months for defense. By 2027, contractors must source China-free magnets.
Yet gaps loom. U.S. heavy REE separation is nascent; MP’s output is 1 percent of China’s 138,000-ton NdFeB capacity. Permitting delays—10-15 years for refineries—stem from environmental rules, versus China’s lax standards. Private investment lags due to volatility; Trump’s Ukraine deal eyes deposits, but extraction lags. Overall, diversification covers 19 percent of needs sans Chinese intermediaries, far from self-sufficiency.
Future Outlook: A Race Against Beijing’s Leverage
By 2030, REE demand could double amid electrification and arms races, pressuring fragile chains. If Trump-Xi talks falter—post-October truce expiration—full restrictions could spike prices 500 percent, as in 2010, crippling DoD budgets. Success hinges on scaling allies: Australia tripling output by 2027, Japan-Vietnam tech transfers. Domestically, workforce training and R&D hubs like the Australian Critical Minerals Hub offer models.
Ultimately, the Pentagon’s REE bind exemplifies supply chain weaponization in hybrid warfare. Breaking it demands sustained bipartisan will, blending carrots (incentives) with sticks (tariffs on Chinese REEs). Failure risks not just delayed jets, but a eroded deterrence, ceding initiative to a rival that turns elements into empire.
Verified Link List
- https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2025/04/chinas-rare-earth-mineral-squeeze-will-hit-pentagon-hard/404776/
- https://www.csis.org/analysis/consequences-chinas-new-rare-earths-export-restrictions
- https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2025/07/how-chinas-new-rare-earth-export-controls-target-pentagonand-world/406606/
- https://www.thecipherbrief.com/column_article/the-pentagons-rare-earth-problem-is-a-china-problem-too
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/14/us/politics/china-critical-minerals-risk-military-programs.html
- https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/08/11/china-rare-earths-us-defense-military-pentagon-supply-chain/
- https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-tightens-rare-earth-export-controls-2025-10-09/
- https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-new-rare-earth-and-magnet-restrictions-threaten-us-defense-supply-chains
- https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/09/business/china-rare-earth-samarium-fighter-jets.html
- https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/08/11/china-rare-earths-us-defense-military-pentagon-supply-chain/
- https://www.csis.org/analysis/consequences-chinas-new-rare-earths-export-restrictions
- https://www.csis.org/analysis/trump-strikes-deal-restore-rare-earths-access
- https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2025/04/chinas-rare-earth-mineral-squeeze-will-hit-pentagon-hard/404776/
- https://www.csis.org/analysis/consequences-chinas-new-rare-earths-export-restrictions
- https://elements.visualcapitalist.com/visualizing-how-rare-earths-power-u-s-defense/
- https://www.army-technology.com/features/securing-the-rare-earth-supply-chain-is-crucial-for-defence/
- https://www.csis.org/analysis/consequences-chinas-new-rare-earths-export-restrictions
- https://www.gao.gov/blog/critical-materials-are-high-demand.-what-dod-doing-secure-supply-chain-and-stockpile-these-resources
- https://www.csis.org/analysis/consequences-chinas-new-rare-earths-export-restrictions
- https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-new-rare-earth-and-magnet-restrictions-threaten-us-defense-supply-chains
